Loopio is an RFP response and proposal management platform. Pricing starts at $20,000 per year for the foundation plan. However, the total cost rises significantly when you factor in seat-based scaling, essential add-ons, and the ongoing administrative work required to keep the content library accurate.
This guide breaks down what Loopio actually costs, what users say after using it, and how a newer generation of AI-native tools compares.
What pricing does Loopio offer?
Loopio's pricing starts at $20,000 per year and scales from there. The vendor publishes this entry-level figure publicly, a relative rarity in the RFP software category, but the full cost picture requires understanding the tier structure, the add-on strategy, and the hidden seat math underneath.
The three-tier model
Loopio offers three plans: Foundations, Enhanced, and Enterprise. Each tier unlocks progressively more capability, with pricing customized by team size and contract length for the upper tiers.
- Foundations: $20,000/year base, includes 10 seats, core content library, and basic automation. Designed for smaller sales-led RFP teams.
- Enhanced: Adds deeper content management features and more collaboration controls. Recommended by Loopio for 'mature, collaborative proposal teams.'
- Enterprise: Flexible licensing, multi-library support, and custom solutions built directly with the Loopio team.
Third-party procurement data puts the median Loopio buyer at approximately $22,786 per year, with the range running from roughly $11,000 to over $55,000 annually depending on team size, tier, and negotiation.
The seat tax
Loopio's per-seat pricing model is where mid-market teams most often hit a wall. At approximately $75–$100 per user per month, expanding access to occasional contributors, subject matter experts who answer a handful of questions per quarter, quickly inflates the annual cost.
Buyers consistently flag this as a friction point. The people who hold the institutional knowledge are too expensive to license as full users, so they end up answering questions over Slack instead.
Costs to watch out for
- Add-ons that should be standard: Several features that most enterprise teams need, such as SSO, CRM integrations, and advanced reporting, sit outside the base Foundation plan and require paid upgrades or bundling. Procurement platform Vendr reports that buyers who negotiate add-ons upfront rather than adding them post-signature can save 35–45% on total contract value. The implication: the initial quote rarely reflects the true cost.
- Project translations. For global teams responding to RFPs in multiple languages, this capability is available as a standalone add-on. It's frequently negotiated as part of the base contract for international deployments rather than purchased separately.
- Onboarding packages. Loopio offers structured implementation support for larger teams migrating from legacy systems. These are sold separately from the license and add to the first-year cost, particularly for organizations with large libraries of existing proposal content.
- Renewal risk. Like most SaaS platforms, Loopio pricing can escalate at renewal. Buyers report negotiating favorable multi-year terms during initial contract discussions to lock in rates before leverage shifts at renewal.
What are user reviews for Loopio?
A verified user in a mid-market organization faced issues with the interface as well the AI generated responses.
A verified user who works in financial services for an enterprise organization mentioned frequent system outages and difficulty in searching across multiple categories.
A verified user in IT and services who works for a small business who faced problems when answering specific technical questions.
Key features of Loopio
A more detailed breakdown of Loopio’s features
Loopio is purpose-built for RFP response and questionnaire automation. Core capabilities include:
- Magic autofill from content library: Matches incoming questions to stored answers; most effective on well-maintained libraries with familiar question types.
- Centralized Q&A library: Stores and organizes approved responses with tags, categories, and periodic review cycles managed by content owners.
- Collaboration and SME routing: Task assignment, review workflows, comment threads, and deadline tracking within projects.
- Multi-format support: Works with Word, Excel, PDF questionnaires and web-based procurement portals.
- Integrations: Salesforce, SharePoint, Google Drive, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Seismic, Highspot, and others.
- Analytics and reporting: Content usage tracking, win rate visibility, and response performance metrics on Enhanced plans and above.
What Loopio does not do: It doesn't generate responses from call transcripts or CRM deal history, it doesn't build pre-call briefs or deal summaries, and it doesn't pull live context from your conversations with a specific buyer to tailor answers to that deal.
Loopio’s pros and cons
When Loopio works well: Teams running 20-100+ RFPs per month with a dedicated proposal manager, an established content library, and the budget and discipline to maintain it.
When it breaks down: Teams that need the tool to connect dots across deal context, what was discussed in discovery, what's in the CRM, what the buyer's specific concerns are, or where no one has consistent bandwidth for library maintenance, often find the first draft quality deteriorating within months of setup.
What is the implementation and setup process for Loopio?
Loopio implementation takes 15 to 60 days for most teams and nearly 2 months for enterprise rollouts. This is significantly faster than legacy alternatives such as Qvidian, and Loopio's onboarding team is consistently praised in reviews for its structured, hands-on approach.
The typical process unfolds across five phases:
- Kickoff and process mapping: An onboarding manager reviews your current RFP workflow, identifies gaps, and maps the Loopio implementation to your team's structure.
- Content migration: Existing proposal content, past answers, and approved responses are centralized and structured into the library with appropriate tags and categories.
- Stakeholder onboarding: Administrators and super-users are trained first; SMEs and contributors follow in a second phase to avoid overwhelming occasional users upfront.
- First live project: The team runs an actual incoming RFP through the platform, triggering Magic autofill, assigning sections, and completing the review cycle for the first time.
- Library hygiene setup: Review cycles are configured, and ownership is assigned so the library stays current after the implementation team steps away.
The implementation timeline depends heavily on content volume and stakeholder complexity. Teams with large libraries of legacy content or complex multi-department workflows land toward the longer end of the range. Loopio claims enterprise global rollouts are achievable in 4 to 6 weeks, an aggressive timeline that requires significant internal alignment and a dedicated champion.
The important caveat: the library only becomes valuable once it reaches what reviewers call 'maturity.' That point, where Magic starts consistently returning high-quality matches, comes after the library has been populated, refined, and updated through real submissions. For most teams, that takes months of active use, not just the implementation window.
SiftHub vs. Loopio
Loopio helps you respond to RFPs faster. SiftHub goes further; it connects the RFP to the rest of your deal, so the context your team gathered in discovery actually shows up in the response. Instead of pulling from a library someone has to maintain, SiftHub reads your CRM, call recordings, and Slack to generate responses that reflect what this specific buyer actually cares about.
1. Live deal context vs. maintained library
Loopio generates answers from a content library that must be built, populated, and actively kept current. SiftHub connects to your live GTM stack, Gong, Salesforce, Google Drive, Slack, and pulls context from actual deal history when drafting responses.
- Answers reflect the buyer's industry, use case, and deal stage
- No library to build, tag, or run review cycles on
- Auto-fill rates of 70–90% from connected, always-current knowledge
What you get: RFP responses that sound like your best rep wrote them for this deal, not like someone pulled them from a folder that hasn't been touched since last quarter.
2. Full deal orchestration vs. RFP-only
Loopio starts and ends at the questionnaire. SiftHub manages the entire deal cycle, from pre-call prep to RFP response to post-deal handover, automatically triggered by deal signals.
What you get: One platform that works across the entire deal, not just the window where an RFP lands.
3. AI that understands the RFP, not just answers it
Loopio's Magic feature matches incoming questions to stored answers. SiftHub reads the full intake document, including appendices, buried requirements, and deadline references scattered across pages, and generates a structured checklist of milestones, mandatory submissions, and recommended attachments before drafting begins.
- AI Suggestions decode the full scope of the RFP automatically
- Smart document recommendations pull the right attachments from your knowledge base
- One-click task creation with owners and due dates from the intake docs
- Executive summary with deal context, competitors, key risks, and instructions, ready for alignment or handoff
What you get: Less time hunting for requirements. More time submitting a response that's actually complete.
Key features of SiftHub
- RFPs: Reads intake documents, generates structured checklists, and auto-fills 80–90% of responses from your live, connected knowledge. Source attribution on every answer. Works natively across software like Google Sheets/Docs and Microsoft Excel/Word, no import/export loops.
- Project tasks: Purpose-built RFP workflow management includes document submissions, milestone tracking, and submission coordination in one place. Assign owners, set due dates, leave comments, and move files to your submission checklist with one click.
- Deal brief builder: Auto-generated briefs for every opportunity, pulling from calls, emails, Salesforce, and enablement content. Role-specific views for AEs, SEs, CS, and leadership. Pre-call prep and handover docs are created automatically when deal signals trigger them.
- Sales collateral builder: Tailored collateral like solution stories, battlecards, proposals, and POV decks generated from live CRM and call data, not generic templates.
- Enterprise-grade security: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and VAPT certified. Granular RBAC, SSO, full audit trails, and region-aware data residency for healthcare, BFSI, and regulated industries.
Loopio is a capable tool for teams with a dedicated Proposal Manager, a well-maintained library, and the budget to absorb per-seat scaling. If your challenge is bigger, disconnected deal context, reps piecing together information from Slack the night before a call, or RFP responses that don't reflect what you learned in discovery, SiftHub is built for that.
FAQ on Loopio pricing and reviews
1. How much does Loopio cost in 2026?
Loopio pricing starts at $20,000 per year for the Foundations plan, which includes 10 seats. The median buyer pays approximately $22,786 annually, with total costs ranging from $11,000 to over $55,000 depending on team size, tier, and add-ons. Essential features like SSO and CRM integrations are priced separately from the base plan.
2. Is Loopio worth it for small or mid-market teams?
Loopio is best suited for teams with a dedicated Proposal Manager and consistent RFP volume. The per-seat pricing model makes it expensive to extend access to occasional contributors, and the platform delivers the most value once the content library reaches maturity, a process that takes months of active use. Smaller teams often struggle to justify the cost-to-value ratio at the Foundations tier.
3. How long does Loopio implementation take?
Loopio implementation takes 15 to 60 days for most teams, with enterprise global rollouts achievable in 4 to 6 weeks, according to Loopio. The timeline depends on content migration volume and stakeholder complexity. The library typically requires an additional few months of active use before it meets the quality threshold for Magic autofill to deliver consistent, high-quality matches.
4. Does Loopio's Magic AI work well?
Magic performs reliably on standard, repetitive questions when the library has strong, up-to-date content. It struggles with complex or contextual questions, a pattern that appears consistently across 600+ verified user reviews. Teams report that Magic handles the familiar work adequately but leaves the hardest questions to manual drafting.
5. What is the main difference between Loopio and SiftHub?
Loopio generates answers from a content library that requires ongoing manual maintenance. SiftHub automatically syncs with your existing data sources, CRM, call recordings, Slack, and document repositories, to generate deal-specific responses without a migration project or dedicated admin. SiftHub also extends beyond RFPs to cover pre-call briefs, post-call follow-ups, battlecards, and sales-to-CS handover documents.
6. What integrations does Loopio offer?
Loopio integrates with Salesforce, SharePoint, Google Drive, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Seismic, Highspot, OneDrive, Dropbox, Okta, and HubSpot CRM. SSO integration is available but typically requires an add-on or higher-tier plan. Loopio does not have a public API.
